Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 121-126, February 2008
QT-interval dispersion in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with post-myocardial infarction☆
Abstract
Background and aims
QT-interval dispersion (QTD), which reflects spatial ventricular repolarization inhomogeneity, has been reported to increase and to have a prognostic value in patients with either myocardial infarction or diabetes. Our aim was to compare increases in QTD in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients following post-myocardial infarction (post-MI). We also compared QTD in type 2 diabetic patients with post-MI treated with insulin, sulfonylurea, or diet alone.
Methods and results
We determined the rate corrected QT-interval (QTc) dispersion (QTcD) in 178 consecutive post-MI patients, including 48 type 2 diabetic and 130 non-diabetic patients. The QTcD, measured with software (QTD-1), was defined as the difference in the minimum and maximum QTc in any of the 12 standard electrocardiographic leads. There were no significant differences in age, gender, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, ejection fraction, or minimum QTc between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with post-MI. Compared with post-MI patients without diabetes, those with type 2 diabetes had higher maximum QTc (481
±
37 vs. 459
±
43
ms, P
<
0.05) and QTcD (67
±
18 vs. 58
±
16
ms, P
<
0.05). Among type 2 diabetic patients with post-MI treated with insulin, sulfonylurea, or diet alone, the QTcD (81
±
18 vs. 64
±
16 vs. 62
±
17
ms, P
<
0.05, respectively) was significantly greater and the R-R interval was shorter in the insulin therapy group.
Conclusions
Type 2 diabetes is associated with an additional increase in the QTD in post-MI patients. This additional increase in spatial repolarization inhomogeneity might be implicated in the increased mortality risk in post-MI patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings were thought to be more striking in the insulin therapy group.
Keywords: QT-interval dispersion, Myocardial infarction, Type 2 diabetes, Insulin therapy, Repolarization inhomogeneity
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ Portions of the results were presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2005, Stockholm, Sweden, September 3–7, 2005.
PII: S0939-4753(06)00199-2
doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2006.09.002
© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 121-126, February 2008
