Advertisement

More appendicular lean mass relative to body mass index is associated with lower incident diabetes in middle-aged adults in the CARDIA study

Published:October 10, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2022.09.017

      Highlights

      • Appendicular lean mass relative to BMI is inversely associated with diabetes risk.
      • The association may be explained by other diabetes risk factors.
      • Other diabetes risk factors, e.g. waist circumference, are more easily measured.

      Abstract

      Background and aims

      Although lower lean mass is associated with greater diabetes prevalence in cross-sectional studies, prospective data specifically in middle-aged Black and White adults are lacking. Relative appendicular lean mass (ALM), such as ALM adjusted for body mass index (BMI), is important to consider since muscle mass is associated with overall body size. We investigated whether ALM/BMI is associated with incident type 2 diabetes in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study.

      Methods and results

      1893 middle-aged adults (55% women) were included. ALM was measured by DXA in 2005-06. Incident type 2 diabetes was defined in 2010–11 or 2015–16 as fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/L (126 mg/dL), 2-h glucose on OGTT ≥11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) (2010–11 only), HbA1C ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%) (2010–11 only), or glucose-lowering medications. Cox regression models with sex stratification were performed.
      In men and women, ALM/BMI was 1.07 ± 0.14 (mean ± SD) and 0.73 ± 0.12, respectively. Seventy men (8.2%) and 71 women (6.8%) developed type 2 diabetes. Per sex-specific SD higher ALM/BMI, unadjusted diabetes risk was lower by 21% in men [HR 0.79 (0.62–0.99), p = 0.04] and 29% in women [HR 0.71 (0.55–0.91), p = 0.008]. After adjusting for age, race, smoking, education, physical activity, and waist circumference, the association was no longer significant. Adjustment for waist circumference accounted for the attenuation in men.

      Conclusion

      Although more appendicular lean mass relative to BMI is associated with lower incident type 2 diabetes in middle-aged men and women over 10 years, its effect may be through other metabolic risk factors such as waist circumference, which is a correlate of abdominal fat mass.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      DXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry), BIA (bioelectrical impedance analysis), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), CT (computed tomography), ALM/BMI (appendicular lean mass for body mass index), FNIHSP (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia Project), CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nathan D.M.
        Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus.
        N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 1676-1685https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199306103282306
        • Zhang P.
        • Zhang X.
        • Brown J.
        • et al.
        Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030.
        Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 87: 293-301https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.026
        • Baron A.D.
        • Brechtel G.
        • Wallace P.
        • Edelman S.V.
        Rates and tissue sites of non-insulin- and insulin-mediated glucose uptake in humans.
        Am J Physiol. 1988; 255: E769-E774https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1988.255.6.E769
        • Maden-Wilkinson T.M.
        • Degens H.
        • Jones D.A.
        • McPhee J.S.
        Comparison of MRI and DXA to measure muscle size and age-related atrophy in thigh muscles.
        J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013; 13: 320-328
        • Bredella M.A.
        • Ghomi R.H.
        • Thomas B.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of DXA and CT in the assessment of body composition in premenopausal women with obesity and anorexia nervosa.
        Obesity. 2010; 18: 2227-2233https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.5
        • Kalyani R.R.
        • Metter E.J.
        • Ramachandran R.
        • Chia C.W.
        • Saudek C.D.
        • Ferrucci L.
        Glucose and insulin measurements from the oral glucose tolerance test and relationship to muscle mass.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012; 67: 74-81https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glr022
        • Batsis J.A.
        • Mackenzie T.A.
        • Jones J.D.
        • Lopez-Jimenez F.
        • Bartels S.J.
        Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and inflammation: results from the 1999-2004 national health and nutrition examination survey.
        Clin Nutr. 2016; 35: 1472-1483https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.03.028
        • Srikanthan P.
        • Karlamangla A.S.
        Relative muscle mass is inversely associated with insulin resistance and prediabetes. Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
        J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96: 2898-2903https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0435
        • Bower J.K.
        • Meadows R.J.
        • Foster M.C.
        • Foraker R.E.
        • Shoben A.B.
        The association of percent body fat and lean mass with HbA1c in US adults.
        J Endocr Soc. 2017; 1: 600-608https://doi.org/10.1210/js.2017-00046
        • Lim S.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Yoon J.W.
        • et al.
        Sarcopenic obesity: prevalence and association with metabolic syndrome in the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA).
        Diabetes Care. 2010; 33: 1652-1654https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0107
        • Kim K.S.
        • Park K.S.
        • Kim M.J.
        • Kim S.K.
        • Cho Y.W.
        • Park S.W.
        Type 2 diabetes is associated with low muscle mass in older adults.
        Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014; 14: 115-121https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12189
        • Seko T.
        • Akasaka H.
        • Koyama M.
        • et al.
        Lower limb muscle mass is associated with insulin resistance more than lower limb muscle strength in non-diabetic older adults.
        Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019; 19: 1254-1259https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13805
        • Han S.J.
        • Boyko E.J.
        • Kim S.K.
        • Fujimoto W.Y.
        • Kahn S.E.
        • Leonetti D.L.
        Association of thigh muscle mass with insulin resistance and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japanese Americans.
        Diabetes Metab J. 2018; 42: 488-495https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2018.0022
        • Kim H.K.
        • Lee M.J.
        • Kim E.H.
        • et al.
        Longitudinal changes of body composition phenotypes and their association with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus during a 5-year follow-up in Koreans.
        Diabetes Metab J. 2019; 43: 627-639https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2018.0141
        • Son J.W.
        • Lee S.S.
        • Kim S.R.
        • et al.
        Low muscle mass and risk of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and older adults: findings from the KoGES.
        Diabetologia. 2017; 60: 865-872https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4196-9
        • Li J.J.
        • Wittert G.A.
        • Vincent A.
        • et al.
        Muscle grip strength predicts incident type 2 diabetes: population-based cohort study.
        Metab Clin Exp. 2016; 65: 883-892https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2016.03.011
        • Larsen B.A.
        • Wassel C.L.
        • Kritchevsky S.B.
        • et al.
        Association of muscle mass, area, and strength with incident diabetes in older adults: the health ABC study.
        J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016; 101: 1847-1855https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3643
        • Kalyani R.R.
        • Metter E.J.
        • Xue Q.L.
        • et al.
        The relationship of lean body mass with aging to the development of diabetes.
        J Endocr Soc. 2020; 4https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa043
        • Studenski S.A.
        • Peters K.W.
        • Alley D.E.
        • et al.
        The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014; 69: 547-558https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glu010
        • Peters S.A.E.
        • Muntner P.
        • Woodward M.
        Sex differences in the prevalence of, and trends in, cardiovascular risk factors, treatment, and control in the United States, 2001 to 2016.
        Circulation. 2019; 139: 1025-1035https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035550
        • Deurenberg P.
        • Deurenberg-Yap M.
        • Guricci S.
        Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship.
        Obes Rev. 2002; 3: 141-146https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-789x.2002.00065.x
        • Meeks K.A.
        • Freitas-Da-Silva D.
        • Adeyemo A.
        • et al.
        Disparities in type 2 diabetes prevalence among ethnic minority groups resident in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Intern Emerg Med. 2016; 11: 327-340https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-015-1302-9
        • Golden S.H.
        • Yajnik C.
        • Phatak S.
        • Hanson R.L.
        • Knowler W.C.
        Racial/ethnic differences in the burden of type 2 diabetes over the life course: a focus on the USA and India.
        Diabetologia. 2019; 62: 1751-1760https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-4968-0
        • Friedman G.D.
        • Cutter G.R.
        • Donahue R.P.
        • et al.
        CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1988; 41: 1105-1116https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90080-7
        • Zhu N.
        • Jacobs Jr., D.R.
        • Sidney S.
        • et al.
        Fat mass modifies the association of fat-free mass with symptom-limited treadmill duration in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2011; 94: 385-391https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.110.008995
        • Jacobs Jr., D.R.
        • Hahn L.P.
        • Haskell W.L.
        • Pirie P.
        • Sidney S.
        Validity and reliability of short physical activity history: cardia and the Minnesota heart health Program.
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1989; 9: 448-459https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-198911000-00003
        • Srikanthan P.
        • Hevener A.L.
        • Karlamangla A.S.
        Sarcopenia exacerbates obesity-associated insulin resistance and dysglycemia: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III.
        PLoS One. 2010; 5e10805https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010805
        • Janssen I.
        • Heymsfield S.B.
        • Wang Z.M.
        • Ross R.
        Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr.
        J Appl Physiol. 2000; 89 (1985): 81-88https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.81
        • Shin Y.
        • Moon J.H.
        • Oh T.J.
        • et al.
        Higher muscle mass protects women with gestational diabetes mellitus from progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus.
        Diabetes Metab J. 2022; https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0334
        • Kim T.N.
        • Park M.S.
        • Ryu J.Y.
        • et al.
        Impact of visceral fat on skeletal muscle mass and vice versa in a prospective cohort study: the Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study (KSOS).
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e115407https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115407
        • Bijlsma A.Y.
        • Meskers C.G.
        • van Heemst D.
        • Westendorp R.G.
        • de Craen A.J.
        • Maier A.B.
        Diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia relate differently to insulin resistance.
        Age (Dordr). 2013; 35: 2367-2375https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9516-0
        • Rehunen S.K.
        • Kautiainen H.
        • Korhonen P.E.
        • Eriksson J.G.
        Lean body mass is not beneficial, but may be detrimental for glucose tolerance - splitting body mass index according to body composition.
        Prim Care Diabetes. 2020; 14: 747-752https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2020.05.003
        • Baker C.F.
        • Overvad K.
        • Dahm C.C.
        Lean body mass and risk of type 2 diabetes - a Danish cohort study.
        J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019; 18: 445-451https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-019-00438-7